sábado, 24 de outubro de 2026
PesquisarExplore
pt.VIA.NEWS

Fintech Brasil

2 articles

Inter atinge custo de funding de 65,6% do CDI com modelos de crédito baseados em IA

Inter atinge custo de funding de 65,6% do CDI com modelos de crédito baseados em IA

O Inter & Co alcançou custos de funding de 65,6% do CDI, liderando o setor bancário brasileiro. A instituição é a que mais cresce no Brasil entre bancos com mais de 20 milhões de clientes. Novos coortes de clientes transacionam mais rápido que anteriores, evidenciando maior engajamento.

Equipa editorial ViaNews (países Lusófonos)•
O que sabemos · a inteligência por trás desta página
Ao vivo do substrato
O que estamos a ver
Enterprise Software Races to Govern and Consolidate Around Agentic AI
Enterprise software vendors are repositioning around autonomous AI agents. Salesforce is acquiring Braze, ServiceNow is launching agent governance tools (AI Passport, Super Intelligence Control Tower), SAP is pushing its 'Autonomous Enterprise', and Zeta is launching AthenaOS and its own inference model. Palantir is embedding itself in banking, aviation and sovereign AI infrastructure through partnerships with Customers Bank, Surf Air, Ondas and Armada. Governance, data sovereignty and enforced policy are emerging as preconditions for regulated sectors like finance. Investors such as Norwest see room to disrupt ERP and finance software, and they caution that AI should not be trusted with financial calculations. Consolidation and shareholder disputes (Salesforce/Braze, Tiny/Oso Cloud, ZenaTech/Boardwalktech) show the market reshaping.
A nossa leitura dos dados ›
Sinais que acompanhamos
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Padrões que observamos ›
Onde as fontes divergem
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
Sinalizamos conflitos abertamente ›
Verificado recentemente
✓ Verificado com a fonte original
4,994
factos rastreados à sua fonte — e sinalizamos os que não se confirmam.
101 entidades acompanhadas4,994 factos verificados com a fonte5,475 documentos-fonte arquivados
Consulte estes dados → isubstrate.com