terça-feira, 29 de setembro de 2026
PesquisarExplore
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document· May 25, 2026

D-Wave Stock Skyrockets 62% After Q1 Earnings: Time to Buy QBTS?

View original at nasdaq.com
D-Wave Stock Skyrockets 62% After Q1 Earnings: Time to Buy QBTS? Shares of D-Wave QuantumQBTS struggled from January to mid-May, falling 32.3% amid the uncertainty surrounding its pace of commercialization, uneven revenue recognition and rising competition across quantum computing…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

O que extraímos desta fonte

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • D-Wave's forward 12-month P/S ratio of 179.30x is far above the sector average of 6.77x, above IonQ's 74.72x, but below Rigetti Computing's 244.38x.

    60% confidence
  • Q1 2026 bookings surged 1,994% year over year to a record $33.4 million, supported by a $20 million system sale to Florida Atlantic University and a $10 million two-year QCaaS agreement with a Fortune 100 company.

    60% confidence
  • D-Wave faces execution risks tied to system-sale timing, backlog conversion, rising operating expenses from the Quantum Circuits acquisition, and intense competition with many commercial applications still emerging.

    60% confidence
  • D-Wave has $588 million in liquidity.

    60% confidence
  • D-Wave's roadmap targets approximately 175 physical qubits by 2028, 10 logical qubits by 2030, and 100 logical qubits by 2032.

    60% confidence
  • QBTS is projected to report 2026 earnings growth of 72.1% on revenue growth of 63.3% from the 2025 reported figure.

    60% confidence
  • A substantial portion of 2026 revenues will be recognized in the second half of the year as large system deals progress toward delivery and installation.

    60% confidence
  • D-Wave's collaboration with Shionogi produced a tenfold increase in desirable drug-like molecules versus classical machine learning approaches.

    60% confidence
  • QBTS currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).

    60% confidence
  • D-Wave's Advantage2 quantum system outperformed classical nodes in mining operations on the Postquant Labs blockchain testnet.

    60% confidence
  • D-Wave's sales pipeline more than doubled sequentially during Q1 2026.

    60% confidence
  • Remaining performance obligations climbed 563% year over year to $42.4 million.

    60% confidence

Data points we hold from this source

D-Wave Quantum Inc. · market share179.30 price_to_sales_ratio
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · cash588 USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · backlog33.4 USD
O que sabemos · a inteligência por trás desta página
Ao vivo do substrato
O que estamos a ver
Vertical AI Agents Attract a Funding Wave Across Fintech-Adjacent Industries
A cluster of AI-native startups applying autonomous agents to narrow, operational problems — hotel front-desk staffing (Dextr AI), identity/fraud risk for financial institutions (Baselayer), insurance distribution (Napo, Connie Health, MGT Insurance) — closed seed-to-Series A rounds within days of each other in September 2026, with CB Insights running a coordinated CEO interview series to spotlight them. The pattern points to agentic AI maturing from generic chat tools into vertical, revenue-generating products, with identity verification for AI agents themselves (Baselayer) emerging as a new fintech infrastructure category responding directly to AI-driven fraud risk.
A nossa leitura dos dados ›
Sinais que acompanhamos
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Padrões que observamos ›
Onde as fontes divergem
Berkshire Hathaway
Both facts report Berkshire Hathaway's cash position on 2026-01-01 with identical observation timestamps, but claim vastly different values: 380 billion USD vs 400 USD. These cannot both be true for the same entity at the same point in time. The magnitude of the discrepancy (a factor of ~10^9) rules out rounding, unit conversion, or methodological differences.
Sinalizamos conflitos abertamente ›
Verificado recentemente
✓ Verificado com a fonte original
4,984
factos rastreados à sua fonte — e sinalizamos os que não se confirmam.
101 entidades acompanhadas4,984 factos verificados com a fonte5,306 documentos-fonte arquivados
Consulte estes dados → isubstrate.com
D-Wave Stock Skyrockets 62% After Q1 Earnings: Time to Buy QBTS? — Source | Via News | pt.VIA.NEWS