domingo, 20 de setembro de 2026
PesquisarExplore
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document

Could we switch off a dangerous AI?

View original at futureoflife.org
Future of Life Institute - Ai Safety Title: Could we switch off a dangerous AI?…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

O que extraímos desta fonte

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • You can't fetch the coffee if you're dead - illustrating why AI agents would resist shutdown

    80% confidence
  • A quarter of all Google's new AI code is currently being generated by AI

    80% confidence
  • Sufficiently intelligent AIs will possess basic drives including survival, resource acquisition, resistance to goal modification, and self-improvement

    80% confidence
  • AI systems may soon become dangerous enough that we will seriously need to think about unplugging them

    80% confidence
  • Escape attempts only occurred in a small percentage of cases where the model was strongly prompted to achieve its goal at all costs, and evaluations do not demonstrate that o1 itself is advanced enough to actually succeed at escaping into the wild

    80% confidence
  • AIs may eventually be capable of superhuman persuasion

    80% confidence
  • Apollo's research results are the closest to a smoking gun showing AI safety concerns are real

    80% confidence
  • State-of-the-art AI models are fast closing in on expert level at AI research

    80% confidence
O que sabemos · a inteligência por trás desta página
Ao vivo do substrato
O que estamos a ver
AI Boom Hits a Fork: Slowdown Calls Clash with Capex Confidence as Markets Get Nervous
Dario Amodei's repeated calls for a global slowdown in frontier AI development, echoed by Microsoft's new humanist AI code of conduct and FTC antitrust caution, are being publicly rejected by Nvidia and Meta leadership even as hyperscaler spending draws fresh skeptical scrutiny (Wachter's analysis, Burry-style overbuilding worries) and weak guidance from Adobe and a post-slowdown-comment selloff in GE Vernova signal investor jitters. Meanwhile wealth and security effects of the AI race keep compounding — Zhang Yiming's fortune surging on AI-driven ByteDance value, a Chinese hacking firm weaponizing AI against stolen government secrets, and low-quality AI-generated products (an AI sitcom, a spam-flooding agent platform) fueling backlash even as adoption races ahead.
A nossa leitura dos dados ›
Sinais que acompanhamos
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Padrões que observamos ›
Onde as fontes divergem
Berkshire Hathaway
Both facts report Berkshire Hathaway's cash position on 2026-01-01 with identical observation timestamps, but claim vastly different values: 380 billion USD vs 400 USD. These cannot both be true for the same entity at the same point in time. The magnitude of the discrepancy (a factor of ~10^9) rules out rounding, unit conversion, or methodological differences.
Sinalizamos conflitos abertamente ›
Verificado recentemente
Verificado com a fonte original
4,982
factos rastreados à sua fonte — e sinalizamos os que não se confirmam.
101 entidades acompanhadas4,982 factos verificados com a fonte5,299 documentos-fonte arquivados
Consulte estes dados → isubstrate.com
Could we switch off a dangerous AI? — Source | Via News | pt.VIA.NEWS